Product preview · KunXi Medical LLM · by Great Unicorn Intelligence

Our plan: from passing medical exams to doing clinical work

KunXi Medical LLM is a line of large models and agents for healthcare that Great Unicorn Intelligence is designing. The plan: a 320B medical model acts as the teacher, and three-real training (real data, real environments, real outcomes) lets agents practise 100-step clinical tasks inside replicas of hospital systems. The goal is to return a finished task with a traceable evidence chain, not just a paragraph of text.

Product previewKunXi Medical LLM is at the design and concept stage

This section describes what we plan to build and how we intend to do it — not finished products or results. Product forms, model sizes, technical approaches, features, interfaces, metrics, scenarios and timelines are design concepts that have not been built or validated; they may be adjusted or changed as development, validation and regulatory requirements evolve. Nothing here is a commitment, an offer or a claim of clinical effectiveness.

All rights reserved. No reposting, adaptation or commercial use without written permission.Read the copyright notice

Planned: 320B teacher · 70B / 32B / 7B familyConcept: three-real training (data · environments · outcomes)Target: 100-step clinical tasksDesign: A0–A4 graded actions
KunXi Console · whole-course agent workspaceConcept illustration · not a real product screen · simulated data

Whole-course timeline · seven modalities

  1. Notes
  2. Labs
  3. Imaging
  4. Pathology
  5. ECG
  6. Medication
  7. Follow-up

5 years agoToday

320B KunXi Medical LLM
  • Plan
  • Act
  • Verify
  • Backtrack

Inpatient journey task

Step 63 of 100
  1. Admission assessmentA1 draft
  2. Tests and imagingA3 approval
  3. DiagnosisA1 draft
  4. TreatmentA3 approval
  5. Discharge summaryA1 draft
  6. Coding and settlementA3 compliance alert
  7. Follow-upA2 scheduling

Evidence chainevery conclusion → source note · guideline · 15,500 insurance rules

Conformal abstentionlow confidence → “I’m not sure” → a human takes over

HarnessA3 action awaiting insurance-office approval · full audit

  • 320Bteacher, distilled into three tiers
  • 100 stepslong-horizon clinical tasks
  • 7modalities on one timeline
  • A0–A4graded actions and approvals
The problem with medical AI

High exam scores, low completion on real clinical tasks

NoticeThis module is a design concept, not yet built, and may change.

Swap a case vignette for a multi-turn consultation and diagnostic accuracy drops sharply; asked to work inside an EHR, the best model succeeds only about 70% of the time. The root cause: training is detached from the clinic.

Same model: reading a vignette vs a multi-turn consultation (diagnostic accuracy, %)
025507510082.062.7Multiple-choice diagnosis48.626.4Open-ended diagnosis
  • Reading the vignette (exam style)
  • Multi-turn consultation (AI patient)

CRAFT-MD: GPT-4, 2,000 cases, 12 specialties

69.67%Best model’s success rate on 300 clinical tasks inside an EHRMedAgentBench
0.32→0.46Top score on a physician-graded hard set (out of 1)HealthBench Hard
1.47%Sentence-level hallucination rate in AI-written notes; 44% of them majorCREOLA
Root cause

Models are trained on question banks, textbooks and single-hospital data: static, single-modality, with no real outcomes. KunXi plans to address this with three-real training.

SourcesCRAFT-MD (Nat Med 2025); MedAgentBench (NEJM AI 2025); HealthBench Hard (OpenAI 2025; Baichuan-M2 2025); CREOLA (npj Digit Med 2025); NMPA registrations (ChinaMedGlobal, secondary source)

Six problems · six answers

Every industry problem has a frontier answer

NoticeThis module is a design concept, not yet built, and may change.

On the left, what published studies show today; on the right, the technical answer KunXi plans to use (a design concept, not yet built). Targets are design metrics and must be validated one by one before release.

  1. 01Long-horizon tasks

    What the evidence shows

    Best EHR task success is about 70%; at 98% per step, 100 steps succeed only 13% of the time

    KunXi’s planned answer

    Hierarchical planning + process reward model + Harness checks and backtracking; target ≥ 90% over 100 steps

  2. 02Multimodality

    What the evidence shows

    Approved AI software is mostly single-disease, single-modality; lung and cardiovascular make up 43%

    KunXi’s planned answer

    A whole-course timeline: seven modalities encoded together and reasoned over by one model

  3. 03Real consultations

    What the evidence shows

    In multi-turn consultations, diagnostic accuracy falls from 82% to 63%

    KunXi’s planned answer

    Patient simulators + reinforcement learning on clinical rubrics

  4. 04Hallucination & safety

    What the evidence shows

    1.47% of sentences in AI-written notes are hallucinated; 44% of those are major

    KunXi’s planned answer

    Evidence tracing + conformal abstention + A0–A4 graded approval

  5. 05Hard, long-tail cases

    What the evidence shows

    On a physician-graded hard set, the best score is still below 0.5

    KunXi’s planned answer

    Multi-agent consultation + specialty routing + active learning on the long tail

  6. 06Data silos

    What the evidence shows

    Data sits across hospitals, primary care, insurance and public health; raw data cannot leave its domain

    KunXi’s planned answer

    Multi-domain federated learning + differential privacy: the data stays, the model moves

A doctor in a white coat and blue gloves works a holographic display showing a human body model and vital-sign readouts
Our vision

The goal: AI inside real clinical workflow, with doctors signing off

NoticeThis module is a design concept, not yet built, and may change.

By design, KunXi is not meant to be a general Q&A bot. The plan is to put a medical LLM to work in the real operations of hospitals, pharma companies, insurers and families: reading records, checking rules, verifying orders, drafting summaries, scheduling follow-up. In the design, every step traces back to source evidence, and the closer an action gets to a clinical decision, the stricter its approval.

  • Aims to deliver finished tasks, not just paragraphs of text
  • Designed so every conclusion cites its source: the record, a guideline, a drug label or an insurance rule
  • Agents only suggest; doctors make the clinical decisions

What sets KunXi apart

Three-real training: real data, real environments, real outcomes

NoticeThis module is a design concept, not yet built, and may change.

The usual approach teaches a model to pass exams. We plan to have it do an “internship” inside replicas of hospital systems, then score every decision against what actually happened to the patient afterwards.

Real data

authorised · longitudinal · multimodal

Usual approachQuestion banks, textbooks, papers, single-hospital data

KunXi (planned)Planned: population-wide longitudinal regional data, used only within lawful authorisation: hospitals, primary care, insurance and public health joined up, years of history, seven modalities; raw data never leaves its domain

7 modalitiesyears of history · patient-level timelines

Real environments

digital-twin training ground

Usual approachSingle-turn Q&A, static exam questions

KunXi (planned)Planned: replicas of HIS, LIS, PACS, insurance and pharmacy systems inside the authorised domain, where agents would practise 100-step tasks in a sandbox again and again

100 stepsper task · expert demonstrations across 50 scenario types (planned)

Real outcomes

outcome-replay reinforcement learning

Usual approachMatching reference answers or human preferences

KunXi (planned)By design, the model only sees data up to a given moment and decides; it is then scored on what really followed: readmissions, complications, targets met and cost

Years of follow-upa time moat: outcome data takes years of follow-up to build

Today’s medical LLMsKunXi: three-real training (planned)
What it learns fromQuestion banks, textbooks, papersAuthorised population-wide longitudinal multimodal data
How it practisesSingle-turn Q&A, static questions100-step hands-on tasks in a digital-twin training ground
Who scores itReference answers, human preferenceReal outcomes + rule verifiers + process rewards
Target outputA paragraph of textGoal: a finished task + a traceable evidence chain

SourcesMedAgentBench (NEJM AI 2025) evaluates agents in a virtual EHR, the academic precedent for a “training ground”

Model family

Planned: one 320B teacher, four tiers that reach further down

NoticeThis module is a design concept, not yet built, and may change.

In the plan, the 320B medical model plans long tasks and acts as the teacher; it would be distilled into 70B, 32B and 7B tiers for the cloud, hospitals, appliances and offline devices in primary care. Model sizes and tiers may change.

320B 70B32B7B Cloud flagshipOn-premisesApplianceEdge / offline distil →
  1. 320BCloud flagship

    Long-task planning, RWE evidence packs, claim re-review; teacher for the whole family

  2. 70BOn-premises

    Insurance offices, medical-records departments and wards of tertiary hospitals; the planned first product

  3. 32BAppliance

    Secondary hospitals, medical alliances, check-up centres, pharmacy-chain HQs

  4. 7BEdge / offline

    Primary care, pharmacy stores, wearables and consumer devices

See the model family and deployment

How we will validate it

Five planned validation stages, no efficacy claims before results

NoticeThis module is a design concept, not yet built, and may change.

We plan to validate technical ability, workflow improvement, clinical benefit, safety and economic value separately; exam scores are a floor for capability, never evidence of clinical effectiveness.

  1. ①Internal testing

    Retrospective data; compared with general models, rule engines and people under the same conditions

  2. ②External validation

    Another hospital, another period; patients, institutions and time kept apart

  3. ③Prospective silent run

    Three months in the background with no clinical effect; every case compared with the human result

  4. ④Human–AI evaluation

    “Doctor + AI” versus “doctor”: time, edits, misses

  5. ⑤Economic & clinical studies

    Change in denials and deductions; diagnostic aids follow device clinical-trial rules

See validation & compliance

Note: KunXi Medical LLM is a product preview at the design and concept stage. Unless a public study is cited, the products, capabilities, thresholds, metrics and timelines in this section are KunXi design targets, concepts or estimates — not achieved or measured results — and may change; product screens are concept illustrations with simulated data. By design, the agents only make suggestions; clinical decisions are made by doctors.

Build it with us

Explore putting a medical LLM to work on real clinical tasks

KunXi Medical LLM is at the design and concept stage. Hospitals, pharma companies, insurers, pharmacies and health-management providers who are interested are welcome to talk to us and assess data, workflow and the validation path together.